JAPAN WILL GO NUCLEAR

A Democratic Party control of the U.S. government would mean that we cannot be trusted to enforce treaties negotiated by prior administrations if such enforcement involves any sacrifice.

If you were PM of Japan knowing what we all know about "our" Left, would you depend on America to "defend" you as promised in the 1951 treaty? Wouldn't you be sure that the Democratic party, which is much different than the Democratic party that won WWII, would abandon treaty obligations at the first sign of war?

It is obvious to everyone in the world that the Democrats are now the increasingly cowardly "Ignore it and Hope it Will Just Go Away" crowd; a crowd that includes the college elites, the "artistic" community, and the rest of the sniveling Left. Wouldn't you see that they would join one another to disseminate lies (as they do now), demonstrate in the streets, and effectively paralyze our government? Our Left has no intention of honoring a 1951 treaty with Japan, nor will we honor our 1954 defense commitment to Taiwan. Our Liberals, who practice situational ethics each and every day, will never agree to defend those countries no matter what our treaty "obligations" are. They will claim that "our generation" does not have to enforce agreements made before "we were born." A view they also take toward our own Constitution.

Precedent for articulating the view that calculated violations of trust are as American apple pie? Well during WWII when Roosevelt refused to recognize the "Free French" under de Gaulle after agreeing to do so, the French leader regarded the refusal as a violation of our promise to him. And he got even when he came to power in France in 1958; he cut France loose militarily from NATO, sought detente with the Soviets, formed a separate French force, and caused France to become a nuclear power. Why? Because he "didn't trust the USA to honor any treaties in Europe." This view was duly noted everywhere.

Then there was the French diplomat who, in 1983, told the Atlantic Monthly in a much ballyhooed article, that a particular change in U.S. policy "makes us wonder whether we can count on American administrations."

Want a current example of Left Democrats in power and their twisting of their actions and people so as to look strong? Take a look at how Miami University president, Democrat Donna Shalala, former Secretary of Health and Human Services under Clinton (that name again) "handled" the mob riot that occurred during the Miami vs FIU football game last Saturday. In true Clintonian style, Shalala (shown at left after winning a spelling bee in the fourth grade) is pretending that the rioting players were actually students and not hired thugs put on the payroll to commit mayhem each Saturday in the fall; she would have us all believe that these thugs were actually future scientists, doctors, lawyers (OK, lawyers were out there), teachers, and other professionals. She pretends to stand up and be strong over her reaction to the "disturbance"--an "incident" that included attempted murder, assault with deadly weapons, criminal mayhem, and pushing.

Oh, she got tough all right, Democratic Party tough; she suspended one future Nobel Prize winner out of the mob for the rest of the year and suspended for one game the rest of the future doctors and mobsters. One game? That's it? Miami plays Duke next Saturday, a football girls school that has one of the weakest teams in the country; Miami could beat them with their band; they don't need their first or second stringers to win. But she carefully makes sure that all of them (save one) remain eligible for the next week when Miami plays a tough Georgia Tech team. She then postures to a fawning boot licking Liberal press that she has taken strong action to assure this never happens again.

A meaningless one game suspension isn't even a slap on the wrist. It's a pat on the back and a wink. That's how liberals handle things. That's how they handled North Korea.

She perfectly represents today's Democratic Party. Pretend to do something decisive about pretend people and then pose for the sycophantic Liberal press. Every country thinks she is a typical representative of American leadership and who can blame them? Would you depend on us if you knew that eventually the Democrats like her would come into power?

No, and that's why Japan will pursue the bomb. How close are they? The conviction among many experts is that Japan was very close to having the bomb in 1945, perhaps closer to it than Nazi Germany, and all that research will not go to waste. Currently they operate 55 nuclear reactors in power plants, so we assume they have centrifuges or a large supply of heavy water. They ain't got no uranium mines so they have to import uranium or the U 235 itself, no big deal these days.

Who will act to stop the North Koreans from going crazy? America? Not a chance. We will join in a cowardly "multi-lateral" phony effort to defang the beast. What about other countries? The poor fucking Philippines, who used to think that they had a mutual defense treaty with us, know that we'll let them fry. We will justify our abandonment by falling back on the clause in the treaty that says only communist aggression will be opposed and that North Korea is not really a communist country. Philippinos are all reduced to being "surrender monkeys.: Nobody can depend on us. Anywhere.

Welcome to the club, all you squints. Just leave us alone.