A TRAITOR WILL WIN THE DOMOCRATIC PRIMARY

The purpose of a presidential campaign is to put enough pressure on candidates so that they eventually show us who they are and what they're made of. Obama showed us all yesterday in his comments about the Iraq War. He showed that he is just a party hack who knows what is going on (if he doesn't he's even worse) but spews whatever is popular at the moment.

It's Treason, Folks

It is not possible that anyone in high public life has not read the major article appearing in Commentary right now, an article that spells out exactly the strategy and the tactics to be used to carry that strategy forward. Even more, the process of losing the war at home is also clearly articulated. The Democrats are in the process of a treasonous series of postures, show trials, and outright fabrications designed to gain votes from a populace that is tiring of the war and one that has not been informed by this pathetic White House. In fact when you speak of hallucinatory oratory you need look not further than the Democrat candidates.

Our strategy in Iraq is to slowly impose order upon the worst of the hot spots and gradually impose order on the rest of the country. This order will cause most Iraqis to "come in from the cold" and actively support their government. The tactics are to move massively into one little Provence at a time, control it, and stay there til the country stabilizes. When you combine U.S. forces, Iraqi Security forces, and the Iraqi police there are more than enough "boots on the ground" to succeed. Has this strategy worked in the past? Absolutely, and the exact methods are laid out in an old French military text called Counterinsurgency Warfare: Theory and Practice by the aforementioned David Galula. And if that isn't enough, those Democratic whores can read General Petraeus' field manual (known as FM 3-24) it largely informs. Its masterful approach to breaking, isolating, and then uprooting a terrorist insurgency is the core of our revised near-term strategy for Iraq, a strategy based, in Petraeus’s words, on the principle that “you’re not going to kill your way out of an insurgency.” Gulula again:

.... the key to success lay in bringing to the surface the portion of the populace that hated the guerrillas, and then turning that minority into a majority by a combination of political, social, and cultural initiatives. But of course that crucial portion, Galula wrote, “will not and cannot emerge as long as the threat [of insurgent retaliation] has not been lifted.” This was where military strategy came into play. Galula’s approach boiled down to three stages, each with its own lesson for Iraq today.

We are now engaged in this strategy, and based on the French and Brit past experiences we will succeed in the field. But "our" Left will sabotage us for their own political gain.

......terrorist insurgency is the core of our revised near-term strategy for Iraq, a strategy based, in Petraeus’s words, on the principle that “you’re not going to kill your way out of an insurgency.”

The current surge of 21,500 troops in Baghdad is a textbook example of Galula’s lessons in action. First, as in the northern city of Mosul in 2003-4, where he used a similar grid system, Petraeus aims to turn things around in the single most vital “pink” zone—namely, Baghdad and its environs, within whose fifty-mile radius 80 percent of the violence in Iraq takes place. Critics have already charged that our recent successes in suppressing the militias in this area signify only a temporary respite. But Petraeus, like his predecessor Galula, understands that in counterinsurgency warfare, temporary respites are all there is. The goal is to make those respites last longer and longer, until eventually they become permanent

This success is exactly what the Democrats are working against. For the Democrats to succeed in '08 we must lose in '07. They will cut off funding, set date certains, conduct show trials so that our military is afraid to move. The Democrats and a large portion of our so-called elites are a Fifth Column, traitors who are working against their own country, just as Jean Paul Sartre, and his horrid companion, Simone de Beauvoir did in France in the late 50s. Sartre’s "companion," went so far as to say that the sight of a French army uniform had “the same effect on me that swastikas once did.”. Our elites, led by those disgusting Hollywood Lefties, are doing the Beauvoir bit right now. Our only defense is to educate, something the White House should be doing but their lack of articulation will do more to lose in Iraq than anything else. When push really comes to shove, Bush is the problem. The link below is to the same disgusting Treason Rally in Portland being run by Rodger Schultz that I simply cannot get to work for me.

Replay video | Share video | Watch more videos