1/07/2004

OH SHIT With all the neo con and gayo con Republicans now deciding that a Dean candidate "will be good for the country" (Sullivan, Kristol, Goldberg) just as Clark is closing the gap one might suspect......

I disagree on the "good for the country" bullshit. Why were the rioting McGovernites "good for the country"? The asshole element that is rallying to the Dean banner are all the fascists and anti-Semites this country can produce. To top it off all the racists, other than whites who hate black people, will be on board. What debate will it produce? How will cleaning the clocks of this element help the country, assuming Dean gets his clock cleaned which I think is far from a certain proposition. Huey Long was not good for the country. Father Coughlin was not good for the country. These kinds of people are only "good for the country" if they can't get enough votes to carry Bum Fuck Wyoming. I agree that it looks like Dean right now, but good for the country???? Like forest fires are good for the woods. Dean is a really good infighter and backs away from nothing. I'm going to do a piece where I'll present ads the Democrats can run against Bush, then see if you think Dean can't win.

No comments: