Note: since this posting the always honest New York Times has pulled the graphic. Very Stalinist as well as "if a tree falls in the woods and nobody is there to hear or see it, did it fall at all?"

Can the New York Times get any worse than this? Their graphic on Rove leads off with: Joe Wilson travels to Niger where his wife, Valerie, works under cover. When you go on a smear campaign, a full court press against the president you want to destroy, you lie to get him. Valerie Plame was working under cover in the bars of D.C. and hadn't been under cover in a foreign country for more than five years.

Other reports say that, "Rove testified that Novak told him he had learned and planned to report in a weekend column that Wilson's wife, Plame, had worked for the CIA, and the circumstances on how her husband traveled to Africa to check bogus claims of alleged nuclear material sales to Iraq. Further, Rove told the grand jury that by the time Novak had called him, he believes he had similar information about Wilson's wife from another reporter but had no recollection of which reporter had told him about it first, the source said.

When Novak inquired about Wilson's wife working for the CIA, Rove indicated he had heard something like that, according to the source's recounting of the grand jury testimony." GO HERE FOR WHAT THE TIMES DOESN'T SAY.

For another disgusting example of what used to be a decent newspaper, Schultz outs them here.

And Kaus, again--still---has a super piece HERE; second item down under Double Super Secret Balkanization that tells us the Times is lying in their teeth by not telling their readers the facts (If I sell you a car with defective breaks and don't tell you because you didn't ask....?) about Matt Cooper's emails.