DEESIGHSEIVE LEEDERSHIT
The absolute MUST READ of the day:
Last week Hillary Clinton spoke to the American Israel Public Affairs Committee, and Heather Robinson of PoliticalMavens.com reported that Mrs. Clinton said: "There are many, including our president, who reject any engagement with Iran and Syria. I believe that is a good-faith position to take, but I'm not sure it's the smart strategy that'll take us to the goal we share. What do I mean by engagement or some kind of process? I'm not sure anything positive would come out of it . . . but there are a number of factors that argue for doing what I'm suggesting." Whatever that may be.Mr. Edwards and Mrs. Clinton have something else in common: Both voted for the Iraq war in 2002, and both turned against it only after it became unpopular.
What Edwards said was even worse. Take a look, today's WSJ at above link.
(guide: Power Line)
1 comment:
I I was Iran I would just wait until some Democrat pussy wins the 2008 election. And you thought the hostage crisis was bad back in 1979! We are going to be humiliated as never before. I pray every night that Bush incinerates those bastards in Teheran while we still have time. Iranian agents are in the US, you'd better believe it. Better we deal with that nation now than after Iran gets nuclear weapons. Then those devices will be here and they will be used. I live in the New York area and I know its coming. It is their islamic wet dream. Of course Clinton and Edwards are clueless on this, what did you expect? We are faced with nuclear attack and those to fucks quibble about healthcare paid for by Exxon and the "2 Americas" (from Edward's huge home of course. See the photo on Kim du Toit's website). If you don't pray, this may be a good time to start
Post a Comment